On 06-Nov-97 Steve Lamont wrote:
>To subscribers of the xforms list from spl@szechuan.ucsd.edu (Steve Lamont) :
>
>> > sscanf((char *)datum(),"%*s %s %d %s %d",monat,&tag,time_string,&jahr);
>>
>> Are you sure that everything is correct with this sscanf??? The format
>> string has more identifiers that the variable pointers you pass to it.
>
>Nope, this is at least provisionally correct. The "%*s" means to skip
>the first string token, so there are only 4 parameters necessary in
>the list. Assuming that strings are returned to strings and ints are
>returned to ints, all should be dandy.
>
>I think what I'd check is to make sure that the function datum()
>returns a valid pointer and not NULL.
>
spl
The function datum() just means something like "date()". Next time I'll name
all variables in english, that should be easier for all.
The implementation is just:
char *datum(void)
{
time_t t;
t=time(NULL);
return(ctime(&t));
}
So I think there should be no trouble with that.
Regards
Bjoern
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send the message "unsubscribe" to
xforms-request@bob.usuf2.usuhs.mil or see
http://bob.usuf2.usuhs.mil/mailserv/xforms.html
Xforms Home Page: http://bragg.phys.uwm.edu/xforms
List Archive: http://bob.usuf2.usuhs.mil/mailserv/list-archives/