# To subscribers of the xforms list from "Danny G. Holstein" <danny@holstein.tritonetd.com> :
On 03-Apr-00 Steve Lamont wrote:
># To subscribers of the xforms list from spl@szechuan.ucsd.edu (Steve Lamont)
># :
>
>> Because, I don't want to use a callback. I'm processing a device
>> with a long age process and want to update the parameters screen and
>> check for faults on a short interval (handled by timers) but want to
>> log the results and increase the load on a much longer interval, my
>> sleep() command is part of this slower loop and I want the execution
>> to stay within that loop. ...
>
> I'm not sure I'm able to parse that sentence or understand what you're
> trying to accomplish.
Ouch!
I suppose your fl_sleep should work, it doesn't seem efficient though. I
would like a call like sleep() which doesn't use system resources, except
that I have this other process which I need to run in the background.
What I'm using now works, it's not pretty, though.
Thanks,
...Dan
_________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send the message "unsubscribe" to
xforms-request@bob.usuhs.mil or see
http://bob.usuhs.mil/mailserv/xforms.html
XForms Home Page: http://world.std.com/~xforms
List Archive: http://bob.usuhs.mil/mailserv/list-archives/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 03 2000 - 13:36:14 EDT