[XForms] Re: Xforms-cvs post from emails at hahnebach.com requires approval

[Angus Leeming]

Hi, Bernd,

I'm afraid that you've posted to the wrong list. xforms-cvs at nongnu.org 
is a list documenting commits to the xforms-cvs tree. Or it would be 
if we could get it to work. (Separate problem.)

I've forwarded your mail to the xforms development list at 
<xforms at bob.usuhs.mil>. This list is fairly low volume (5 emails / 
day on a busy day ;-), so I really recommend that you subscribe for a 
little while. See

http://cweblog.usuhs.mil/mailman/listinfo/xforms

Hope to see you there,
Angus

On Sunday 23 May 2004 5:50 pm, xforms-cvs-owner at nongnu.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found the software xstab which I really would like to get
> running. The project has been dead for years. The code is GPL. I
> was trying to compile it for hours. The GUI is based on xforms
> 0.88. It is still listed on
> http://world.std.com/~xforms/new/app.html although the home page is
> dead. The source code can be found at
> http://goemon.polito.it/software/lethal/scheda.php?id=26
>
> I installed the already compiled library of  xform to /usr/local.
> Compiling xstab worked really well for a long time. Than I got the
> following:
>
> ...
> /usr/local/lib/libforms.so: undefined reference to `errno'
> /usr/local/lib/libforms.so: undefined reference to `_xstat'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [XStab] Fehler 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/home/hugo/Documents/xstab/programm/XStab/src' make: *** [srcs]
> Fehler 2
> hugo at linux:~/Documents/xstab/programm/XStab>
>
>
> I found out it is something regarding newer version gcc.
> ("Since version 2.9 of the GCC compiler the compiler has become a
> lot stricter over declaring external references. Undefined
> reference to ?errno?")
>
> I am using gcc 3.3
>
> For me it seems I need to recompile xforms with gcc 3.3 or I coud
> use an older version of gcc. To be honest I really do not have a
> glue what to do next.
>
>
> Thanks for any help
> Bernd Hahnebach
>
> I am not a member of the list would you replies mails to emails at
> hahnebach.com